|
Post by BANNEDgie Jakusz on Apr 13, 2012 12:54:19 GMT -5
Eh...the only reason I made this is because if I don't I have a self-vote, so it's either make something I don't really care about or throw the challenge like I always do and get taken out of the game. I guess if you wanted to give me a point or two you could just note the fact that I chose a Kalahari Marshland instead of the desert to show there's more than one side to this place? I dunno. I cbf tbh.
|
|
|
Post by Tracy Hughes-Wolf on Apr 13, 2012 14:43:02 GMT -5
There are better ways to throw a challenge then to SPECIFY you're throwing a challenge. I was rooting for you to prove us wrong
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Kimmel on Apr 13, 2012 14:48:38 GMT -5
Miss Jakusz, why are you acting like this? You're continually smiting me for NO REASON, and you're acting like a waste of space because you have a problem with me. I still have no idea what that is. If this is still about how I reacted to your self-vote... you don't seem to understand that I ALWAYS act that way when someone self-votes or doesn't do a challenge. Lividmanda is to be taken LIGHTLY. Everyone else I've chewed out KNOWS that. And yet you had to get on my case and tell me how to act. Really... you don't realize just how foolish that is. It's like telling a professor how he should be teaching you. I told you in round one that I wasn't taking any excuses since I was nice enough to rescind that self-vote for not doing the challenge. I don't do that very often, mind you, so consider yourself lucky. I don't want you to continue trolling my game. I've worked hard on it, and having a self-admitted waste of space in the game is discouraging. You keep smiting me, and thus I keep smiting you in return. I'm not the only person who has smited you, mind you. Your warning will increase with every time you smite me; if you get to 100%, you're banned, end of story. I suggest you let this go and give it your all, and focus on writing confessionals and actually doing things instead of smiting the HOST. I have been over this for a while, so I suggest you let it go. If you don't, it's not going to end well for you. That's laid out pretty clearly in the rules. That's all, and thank you for listening
|
|
|
Post by BANNEDgie Jakusz on Apr 14, 2012 1:44:32 GMT -5
Because I take offense to this post, I'm going to address each point seperately. Miss Jakusz, why are you acting like this? You're continually smiting me for NO REASON, and you're acting like a waste of space because you have a problem with me. I haven't seen any area where I can write about why I smite you, so I didn't feel the need to declare in my confessionals. If I see a post by someone I don't like (the post I don't like, not the person, that's a different story), I click the smite button. I don't discriminate between host and player, because there is no difference as far as a small, meaningless little number goes. It's pointless for /anyone/ to get upset over it - hell, I've been in a game where I got into a fight with someone and my thing ended up at -30, but it didn't matter at all. If you'd just apologised at that time instead of trying to defend your actions with "Oh I let you off lightly". Are you saying that in eight/nine seasons of this game, nobody has taken offence to you chewing them out or publically insulting them like you did to me? All I want is an apology for that, really. Nothing more, nothing less. I will highly consider dropping this matter if you do so. Yes, I should consider myself lucky my brother got winged by a car. Thanks for that. And frankly, it's just a meaningless number, so I really don't care what it is. Excuse me? I am not letting this go until you take it for what it is instead of trying to trivialise it. Me, Anthony, Jenn, everyone else, they're meant to be the focus of this game, and for one of the focus of this game to recieve such treatment from the host is disconcerting. Once again, it's a meaningless number. I outlined everything I wanted to address in previous points, so I'll just say what I want to say here. I complained about the way I was treated and asked for an apology because I took offence (which I have every right to do), and you responded by removing my posts about the matter and raising my warning level. This is blatant mistreatment. I have spoken with one of the other hosts, and if this treatment continues I'm going to file an official complaint about your behaviour in this matter. Hosts should not be treating game participants like this. I hope you respond without feeling the need to ban a participant in this game, because as much as I dislike this treatment, I love playing Survivor and it would not do much for my mental well-being to find that a host would take such drastic measures to make sure I'm not in a game. That is all I have to say. --Angie
|
|
|
Post by Amanda Kimmel on Apr 14, 2012 9:40:21 GMT -5
K. I'm sorry for whatever I did wrong. I don't even know what that is. But I'm sorry for it.
I would like you to reciprocate. Because threats like you just made are not a good idea. Nor is treating me like garbage, since I've received complaints about your behavior, too. It goes both ways, sister.
|
|
|
Post by Tracy Hughes-Wolf on Apr 14, 2012 10:30:44 GMT -5
I'm going to file an official complaint about your behaviour in this matter. Hosts should not be treating game participants like this. No offence but Amanda is the owner of the board, which means you'd be filing a complaint to HER lol
|
|